From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87skjmastr.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4C51E509-1043-41DE-A8ED-DA8DA5592733@gmail.com> <0ty6td12qe.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0yqo-0007bw-05 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 10:08:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0yqj-0007aQ-Je for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 10:08:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56833 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0yqj-0007aN-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 10:08:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f162.google.com ([209.85.219.162]:34894) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0yqi-0005MY-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 10:08:53 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4076800ewy.42 for ; Mon, 04 May 2009 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0ty6td12qe.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Bremner Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On May 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, David Bremner wrote: > > At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200, > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: >>> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not >>> emacs >>> -Q for byte-compiling org-mode? >> >> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I >> am not even sure about Emacs 22. > > at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has > "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be > possible to do something similar. Of course then you have switches > depending on Emacs family, and I could see that being too much > trouble. Yes, I prefer to just keep -q which is compatible. Otherwise the installation instructions will become more complicated. - Carsten