From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [PATCH] export to various flavors of (X)HTML Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: <9FCAC37B-1E8B-40D2-8298-CE4B2B38333E@gmail.com> References: <86wqrtwisf.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <517732AF.6080308@gmail.com> <86y5c82hxy.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <871u9ytihc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8f433f7c2e7d4892d6286afc9524d9a6@mail.rickster.com> <87li85tdsm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20130426184949.GB79236@BigDog.local> <87bo8xeuxd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zjwfnzwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20130501115503.GB83182@BigDog.local> <87k3nhqeed.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAJX-0005D1-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:21:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAJW-0008DS-1e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:21:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]:60383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAJV-0008DF-RM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:21:53 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j13so1272417wgh.28 for ; Fri, 03 May 2013 00:21:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3nhqeed.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thanks, I will look at this patch next week. - Carsten On 2.5.2013, at 23:07, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Rick Frankel writes: > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:26:52PM -0700, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >>> Rick Frankel writes: >>> >>>> Whoops. Wrong key. Patch actually attached to this email... >>>> rick >>> >>> Great, I'll consolidate all these -- would it be better to mush them >>> into one big patch, or to keep them separate (I suppose for ease of >>> rollback, if something goes wrong)? >> >> Probably squashing them into one patch would be the best. But Carsten >> or Bastien might disagree :). >> >> rick > > Okay, there it is: one big patch (including your xml declaration fix). > > I didn't add any more refined handling of the html5-fancy option. As a > second-order option it didn't seem worthy of an #+OPTIONS entry, and I > didn't bother checking for an empty string, either. It can always be > #+BINDed if necessary, and if it ever annoys anyone I can fix it > further. > > E > > <0001-ox-html.el-Export-to-different-X-HTML-flavors-includ.patch>