From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:00:45 -0400 Message-ID: <9764.1308938445@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaAgx-00069b-W1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:01:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaAgw-0003kU-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:01:19 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:46859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaAgv-0003kD-Hk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:01:17 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LNB008R93D9LR60@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:00:52 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Michael Brand of "Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:40:21 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Michael Brand Cc: news1142@karl-voit.at, nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Michael Brand wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:01, Nick Dokos wrote: > > Karl Voit wrote: > >> Maybe there is a (to me at least hidden) feature behind the behavior > >> that org-time-stamp (C-c .) deletes any repeater information when > >> used to update a date stamp. > > Same here with "DEADLINE: <2011-06-25 Sat +1w>" > > > AFAIK, org-time-stamp creates a brand-new time stamp: it does not update > > an existing one. You can update the time stamp by just using ordinary > > Emacs command ("it's just text"), or you can put the cursor on various > > parts of the time stamp and do S-up, S-down (bound to org-shiftup and > > org-shiftdown resp.) to change that part. > > If it is a DEADLINE or SCHEDULED you can also use "C-c C-d ." or "C-c > C-s ." as a workaround to preserve the repeater. Therefore I consider > loosing the repeater with just "C-c ." on any active timestamp, no > matter if a DEADLINE, SCHEDULED or not, a bug. > I stand corrected: it does sound like a bug. Nick