-- Mar 3/2/09, Flávio ha scritto: [snip] > Then I decided to start with PROPERTIES for item > > * Apontamento de Horas Gerais > :PROPERTIES: > :COLUMNS: %50ITEM %10CLOCKSUM(Clocked) > %5Effort(Estimate){:} > %5HourSold(Sold){:} > :ID: apontamento_horas > :END: > ** Atendimentos / Serviços > *** Estudo Técnico (externo) > > *** Suporte Técnico > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2008-11-25 Tue 14:30]--[2008-11-25 Tue 19:30] > => 5:00 > CLOCK: [2008-11-24 Mon 13:58]--[2008-11-24 Mon 14:39] > => 0:41 > CLOCK: [2008-11-24 Mon 13:11]--[2008-11-24 Mon 13:48] > => 0:37 > CLOCK: [2008-11-24 Mon 07:00]--[2008-11-24 Mon 07:30] > => 0:30 > :END: > **** My Customer > ***** Motor and valves problem ( go down ) > :CLOCK: > CLOCK: [2008-12-01 Mon 13:00]--[2008-12-01 Mon 15:24] > => 2:23 > CLOCK: [2008-11-26 Wed 15:28]--[2008-11-26 Wed 15:40] > => 0:12 > :END: > ***** 09.00698 - Technical Support > :PROPERTIES: > :Effort: 20:00 > :HourSold: 21:00 > :END: > CLOCK: [2009-02-02 Mon 15:15]--[2009-02-02 Mon 16:56] > => 1:41 > > Then I generate a table using the code: > > #+BEGIN: columnview :hlines 2 :vlines t :id > "apontamento_horas" > :skip-empty-rows t > > #+END: > > The code works fine and my table is ok, but I have some > errors when: > > 1) If I want my CLOCKED column to be the last one and > Estimate at first column, > all clocked values are filled in the first column anyway, > although it is > Estimate. So the solution for this problem was to consider > the CLOCKED always > as the first column. > > 2) If I consider both Effort and HourSold Properties with > the value of 20:00 > under item "09.00698 - Technical Support", I get > an empty column under Sold in > the summary table. So the solution for this problem was to > consider the Effort > 20:00 and Sold 21:00 then I get the correct summary. > > I am using org-mode 6.12b and emacs 22.2.1. Is it a real > problem or I am doing > anything wrong? Org 6.21b Emacs 22.3 WinXP I confirm this bug for the column view export: the column view is displayed correctly, also if the order of colums is changed, but the table, both if generated with C-c C-x i and with C-c C-c on the #+BEGIN columnviev line, is not correct. Please see also the image attached. cheers, Giovanni