From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Filtering for effort in org-agenda
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:57:42 -0400
Message-ID: <9525.1238439462@alphaville.usa.hp.com>
References: <87tz5aq48u.fsf@fastmail.fm>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LoMhY-0002jG-MA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:16 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LoMhT-0002dI-Pp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:15 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45812 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoMhT-0002d0-F0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:11 -0400
Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.44]:19655)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nick@alphaville.usa.hp.com>) id 1LoMhT-0001bF-1f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:59:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
	of "Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:01:37 CDT." <87tz5aq48u.fsf@fastmail.fm>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:

> 
> A quick question. Sometimes during the day, when my effort is flagging,
> I like to see all items that have an effort of, say, < 0:10, so I can do
> a bunch of quick tasks in succession. When I apply the agenda filter ( /
> < 0:10 ), however, the resulting list includes all items that do not have a
> defined effort. Would it be possible to create an option to exclude
> items where effort is nil from the filtered list?
> 
> I had a quick look at org-agenda-compare-effort in org-agenda.el (line
> 4734), and if I'm reading the function correctly, it gives items without
> a defined effort the value of 0. Is this correct?
> 
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
> 

Take a look at org-sort-agenda-noeffort-is-high - it should be t by default
which should do what you want, but maybe you have changed it?

Nick