From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:08:24 +0100 Message-ID: <941701CB-A766-4917-B1B4-A5CE1B43AEDB@uva.nl> References: <5171E67B-8472-409A-A0EE-7EA25D18D58B@uva.nl> <873agmyg4y.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDEsv-0001dW-Ke for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:09:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LDEsu-0001c5-Dh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:09:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45495 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LDEsu-0001bo-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:09:32 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:5316) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LDEst-0005cV-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:09:32 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so508236uga.17 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:09:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sivaram Neelakantan Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Dec 17, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > Paul R writes: > > > [...] > >> Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following >> usages : >> >> * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes >> >> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands >> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:: Kenpo is = the >> name of several martial arts]. > > [...] > > And then we will have that one feature request to cross reference a > previous footnote! :-) In the above case, how would a person go > about asking someone to refer to an earlier footnote? > >> * Usage 2, keyword named footnotes >> >> Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands >> from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:kenpo]. It = is >> primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow =20 >> strikes >> and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands. >> >> [fn:kenpo] Kenpo is the name of several martial arts > > Unless I've got it wrong, wouldn't it be better to do something like > > [fn:kenpo { Kenpo is the name of several martial arts}] > (keep the keyword and definition in one place?) > > And all future references go as 'see [fn:kenpo] to understand the > meaning'. Presumably when exported, all these keywords stuff > disappears and are replaced by standard LaTeX style footnote numbers, > right? > > [...] Hi Sivaram, I can see how this would be represented in HTML (just several links to the same footnote), but how would you represent this in LaTeX? - Carsten