From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:02:31 +0200 Message-ID: <92E7088C-D80E-4B68-BDBB-2099335FFFB7@gmail.com> References: <4A51BFD7.2040804@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <874otqrvpj.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4A51C9AD.9050003@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNl22-0002tu-8x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:02:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNl1v-0002mp-Me for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:02:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58561 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNl1v-0002mY-GA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:02:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com ([209.85.219.208]:41629) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MNl1u-0004uQ-Qo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:02:35 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4602258ewy.42 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:02:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A51C9AD.9050003@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Martin Pohlack Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: > Tassilo Horn wrote: >> Martin Pohlack writes: >> >> Hi Martin, >> >>> I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> * TODO test3 >>> DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and >>> the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally >>> mark it as done. >>> >>> Org-version reports "6.21b". >> >> I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning >> period, it >> works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, >> changing >> the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. > > The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use this? - Carsten