emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

From: Ypo <ypuntot@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 187, Issue 19
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:16:59 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92099cdc-5b19-40eb-8c11-6ed31afd02e1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.17741.1632053521.2507.emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Thanks Max Nikulin

Then I think I will behave like grown people and use LaTeX syntax, previewing it on HTML exports, cause it gives no errors compared to the problematic PDF exports.

Thanks again, best regards

Sep 19, 2021 14:12:15 emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org:

> Message: 20
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:05:01 +0700
> From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
> To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Overlining troubles
> Message-ID: <si791e$14h$1@ciao.gmane.io>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 19/09/2021 00:51, Ypo wrote:
> 
> 
> I use orgmode to read and study directly but I am not able to set up
> LaTeX preview. So I need something "direct", but I can't renounce to
> exporting it.
> 
> 
> For some letters accented characters exist: "ā".
> 
> Inline LaTeX preview just works for me (Linux), so I can suggest nothing
> besides to check "*Org Preview LaTeX Output*" buffer for errors.
> 
> 
> El 18/09/2021 a las 19:32, Timothy escribió:
> 
> 
> If you’re thinking of maths, why not just write inline LaTeX, e.g.
> \(\bar{x}\) ?
> 
> 
> 
> I think, you should follow this recomendations. Typography rules for
> math expressions substantially differ from ones for prose (italic font
> for variables, LaTeX cares concerning proper spaces, etc.).
> 
> When I was writing docs containing math, I had PDF (earlier DVI or PS)
> viewer window open along with LaTeX sources, so I could read formatted
> text. Anyway that time math in WYSIWYG was rather ugly (maybe besides
> texmacs), required heavy mouse work, and such editors had various
> problems with more or less complex documents that were easier for me to
> solve in LaTeX. That is why I never had expectation that source document
> should look like formatted one. Editing of sufficiently complex
> equations in LaTeX is not always convenient though

next      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-19 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.17741.1632053521.2507.emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
2021-09-19 17:16 ` Ypo [this message]
2021-09-20 16:41   ` Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 187, Issue 19 Max Nikulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92099cdc-5b19-40eb-8c11-6ed31afd02e1@gmail.com \
    --to=ypuntot@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).