From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: C-n and saving in agenda buffers Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:19:38 +0200 Message-ID: <909b09c80a364e7f2ba014753a81607f@science.uva.nl> References: <6dbd4d000709271028o26a11e7dvcefeced720d0700b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaxyW-0008Vm-Vd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:20:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaxyS-0008L2-Cf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:20:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaxyS-0008Kn-4m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:20:32 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaxyQ-0001yy-4S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:20:31 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so3318456wah for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6dbd4d000709271028o26a11e7dvcefeced720d0700b@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Denis Bueno Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 27, 2007, at 19:28, Denis Bueno wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, although I kind of lurk on this list, I absolutely adore > org-mode. Carsten's attention to everyone's complaints is amazingly > consistent. Thank you. You are welcome. > Second, in the buffer that shows the agenda for the current week or > day, why is C-n bound to an action that moves you forward a day at a > time? Since the current day shows all my deadlines and TODOs for the > future, it's not likely that one will need to look at days ahead, and > if I do, it's probably not common enough to be bound to something as > fundamental as C-n. I most frequently want to move in agenda buffers > in order to mark TODOs done. Since I always use C-n/C-p instead of > the arrow keys, using the arrow keys in this one particular situation > requires a significant mental step that always causes me to mutter > under my breath. Point taken, and I actually agree and will change this. Note that "n" and "p" also move you around. > Also, I suggest that if I go through an Agenda buffer and mark some > todos done, if I hit C-x C-s it should save the files whose todo items > have changed. This would reinforce the abstraction that I'm really > just looking at my org files through different lenses, and actions in > that abstraction affect the underlying locations. OK, also this is a useful addition. Again, "s" does this already, but I agree C-x C-s is logical. - Carsten