From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Re: log on state change
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:32:14 +0200
Message-ID: <8e4043639cf71fc8b0ea77cfff4c9a58@science.uva.nl>
References: <87abs6j0av.fsf@myhost.localdomain>
	<0ae951a333c90e9d17ccadcfb9e172ee@science.uva.nl>
	<m2odgjveih.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ISGim-0005mC-7V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:32:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ISGil-0005kD-7n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:32:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISGil-0005k0-1N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:32:23 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1ISGik-000228-5F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:32:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2odgjveih.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Sep 3, 2007, at 19:35, Leo wrote:

> On 2007-09-03 17:25 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>> Also is it possible to get to a state without cycling, and have
>>> the loggining feature mentioned above ?
>>
>> Yes, since 5.07, you can mis-use the TAGS interface to directly
>> switch to TODO states.  Check the release notes.
>
> Is this temporary until a better solution is found?

Not at all, I really cannot think of a better solution.
The only thing preliminary about this would be the setup
using Emacs Lisp.  I guess the in-buffer setup like

#+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t)....

is nice and similar to TAGS, so that will stay.

- Carsten