From: Richard G Riley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Bastien <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: resheduling from agenda buffer
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:17:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> (Bastien's message of "Fri\, 28 Sep 2007 18\:09\:16 +0200")
Bastien <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> "Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" <email@example.com> writes:
>> I think the reason is the principle of least surprise.
> Agreed. That's also why rescheduling should perhaps leave some
> persistent warning in the agenda buffer (as S-left/right does).
> I guess it would solve the issue Richard was concerned about.
Most 100% certainly. See the other reply. The S-<left,right>
functionality is spot on. As a noob I believe I am more likely to spot these
inconsistencies that established users. The other reply might have been
private so I include it below:
| While I can understand that, it certainly surprises the user to try and
| reschedule a task that isn't really there. I would suggest that the only
| sensible and usable and consistent thing to do is to mark it as changed
| like with the S-<left,right> .. in this case it hilites the entry as
| changed but you can continue to work on it. And then refresh (r)
| obviously moves all tasks to their correct positions while leaving the
| cursor at the current/next line.
| The functionality for S-<lft,right> is perfect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-28 1:15 resheduling from agenda buffer Richard G Riley
2007-09-28 14:07 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-29 12:45 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-28 15:19 ` Bastien
2007-09-28 15:30 ` Richard G Riley
2007-09-28 15:50 ` Egli Christian (KIRO 41)
2007-09-28 16:09 ` Bastien
2007-09-28 16:17 ` Richard G Riley [this message]
2007-09-28 16:10 ` Richard G Riley
2007-09-28 16:03 ` Bastien
2007-09-28 18:14 ` John Wiegley
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).