From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MGKfKFj7yV7gKgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 04:43:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kL6lJFj7yV55AwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 04:43:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE0AA9402A0 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 04:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jciTV-0004cr-CZ for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 00:43:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdqo-0007gG-Fb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:46:46 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:48747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcdqn-0004bI-62 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 19:46:46 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB26F2400FC for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:46:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1590277601; bh=mHHA/PIuQrYMN9a8KmpiSBevY6be25J7ejbjXpNn2q4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=qdEcqMzsLAe32+xZ1UWOakJXtssSWW1oarY4eK3excqFV6ZyFKmAVAB6Z/rbzPcvM K6aqJhom7XvZzPO9/r+h4EYMNiszCrj/i2cffKMQFMxYh53zoTBH9eCzoWn3xmHmZ6 ktd/IGT43xkiBy1HdcrRubOuuppz0OapPS0BXYpMUbBoUqXB2uZK5LLbbejSoWdi/I Uhkq2L+0mwyxwEo98X+vorsGT4xO9Z5kQ4UsKozqxH6bBMsKVdAN2nUm0UNR4KIFuH nJA27tO07eD2bInSzZ2M111SrxdOaPVOxsdLz6vK2OFLTeiAZurwXc9sPkqu0zAimm IQqN13Zc4fRcw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49V0PS6dgLz9rxX for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 01:46:36 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 01:46:36 +0200 From: lamaglama@posteo.net To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: (org-cycle) in new plain list items Message-ID: <8cad8532ce7e4290b363d633dd2287d6@posteo.net> X-Sender: lamaglama@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=lamaglama@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/23 19:13:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 May 2020 00:42:41 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=qdEcqMzs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.20 X-TUID: kJU8XYkv3B46 It is a minor thing, but it sort of bugs me: When I press in a new plain list item it demotes it, as it should. But when I press again, it does not move to the parent level, like a new headline would. Rather, it goes to the initial level first, before moving on to the parent levels. Is this intended behaviour? Kind Regards