From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: circufix notation for inline <pre> and <strike> styling
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:49:52 +0200
Message-ID: <8c5eb813a5b3cfa54394191d35241654@science.uva.nl>
References: <44859356.6030900@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fncsi-0000vd-R7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:50:08 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fncse-0000tr-DM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:50:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fncse-0000to-8H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:50:04 -0400
Received: from [146.50.4.51] (helo=imap.science.uva.nl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fnd02-0000RZ-4F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:57:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <44859356.6030900@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Austin Frank <austin.frank@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Jun 6, 2006, at 16:38, Austin Frank wrote:

>
>     many programming languages have a ;for; loop.
>
> which would be exported as
>
>     <p>many programming languages have a <pre>for</pre> loop.</p>
>
> another possible syntax would be
>
>     many programming languages have a #for# loop.

I guess these would be reasonable.

>
> The specific markup used isn't really important to me, but I would like
> the ability to specify this kind of formatting for single words instead
> of whole lines.
>
> While I'm at it, is strike-through possible?
>
>     -event- was canceled

I think this one is a bit too likely to occur in a non-intended way, a 
different syntax would be needed, and I am willing to implement it 
(even though strike-through is another one of those markups I would 
never use because I think they could cause an eye injury :-)

- Carsten