From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:23:17 +0200 Message-ID: <8F9082E0-A22C-485F-9E36-E51CE81CA4D7@gmail.com> References: <87skfgxn0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdkduo9s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> <5ea706d0908250520u62ca057cq138201f1397b2c4b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv3f-0008WV-Oc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:23:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv3a-0008OC-Rm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:23:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43127 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfv3a-0008Nm-MT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:23:22 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.148]:13538) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfv3a-0007sV-8P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:23:22 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so928690eyb.24 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:23:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5ea706d0908250520u62ca057cq138201f1397b2c4b@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chris Leyon Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Chris Leyon wrote: > Another solution would be to use "f" and "b" to move forward and > backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to > accommodate this. Old "f" (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become "F" > which is unused. But "b" and "B" are both used and would need to be > remapped. > > Obviously this is not the easiest possible solution. However, these > bindings would be very consistent with the conventions of most other > Emacs packages. > > The agenda mode bindings are getting very crowded with many functions > and free keys are running out. It may be time to start creating > prefix-keys/dispatchers a la Dired and Gnus. > We have started, with the "v" key dispatching view modes. On the other hand, single keys are sooo nice for the common functions. :-) - Carsten > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:48, Carsten Dominik > wrote: >> I tend to agree with the arguments that "n" and "p" should move >> vertically in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do >> it like this. >> >> So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys >> should >> move the agenda forward and backward in time. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode