From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Exporter interface question Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:02:43 +0100 Message-ID: <8993D674-E5E6-4B8E-AE3C-75F694371459@gmail.com> References: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAiWy-00053S-Pq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:02:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAiWt-0000b3-C7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:02:52 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:37665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAiWt-0000av-5P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:02:47 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id j5so322153bkw.19 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:02:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-mode List On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Carsten Dominik writes: >=20 >> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the >> previous export action, that is extremely useful. >>=20 >> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I >> was wondering if others would also find this proposal >> useful: >>=20 >> When exporting a subtree, lets drop a mark at the >> headline and then go to this mark when C-c C-e is >> called with a prefix arguments. This would allow >> to keep the cursor somewhere deep in the subtree while >> working on it, and still be able to quickly repeat the >> export command. >=20 > It would be nice indeed. >=20 > Though, it may be useful to put some additional limitations to this > feature. For example, it would trigger only when on the same buffer as > before, perhaps even within the same subtree. >=20 > What do you think about it? >=20 >> If others would find this useful, I'd make a patch. >=20 > Be my guest. ;) OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires that = I study the ui interface a bit more. If you want to rush ahead and = implement it let me know - otherwise this will be a few days before I = find the time. - Carsten