From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: emailorama Subject: Re: [babel] Is ":results output inline" possible Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <891417.62649.qm@web111312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1Epl-000185-9C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:45:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1Epg-00017G-Ti for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:45:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35905 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1Epg-00017D-LH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:45:08 -0400 Received: from web111312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.15.197]:39705) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1Epf-0002d1-U2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:45:08 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>> -- Is it possible to use #+lob: with ":results output org" ? >>> -- Is it possible for #+lob: to take a string argument ? >> >> Both these were bugs, which are fixed in my development branch -- they >> should be merged into org-core by Eric soon. > > Those changes are in the main org git repo now, so your examples should > work. Note that with your third example, the header args need to be > placed on the #+lob line rather than with the source block, so > that #+lob knows that it is to output org code (header args placed > with #+lob are inherited by the referenced source block). Hello Dan, Wow - that was fixed quickly ! org-mode is a great package, and babel and #+lob bring such nice integration with several useful languages. I'm probably just beginning to realize the potential. Thanks very much for your response, al =0A=0A=0A