From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id uDqCK0rtj2MB+QAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 02:32:58 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id ODNkK0rtj2NlWgEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 02:32:58 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B78613F7B1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:32:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2jI1-0000p9-7L; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:32:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2jHw-0000oh-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:31:56 -0500 Received: from relay-egress-host.us-east-2.a.mail.umich.edu ([18.216.144.57] helo=moral-myrddin.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2jHv-0002o1-2e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:31:56 -0500 Received: from impeccant-ellyllon.authn-relay.a.mail.umich.edu (ip-10-0-72-31.us-east-2.compute.internal [10.0.72.31]) by moral-myrddin.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu with ESMTPS id 638FED07.8B22C79.569029E3.1020943; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:31:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=relay-2018-08-29; t=1670376710; bh=6MrkTDzwbqqAdTcmXPmxwdVlK0/CiGYGNQVa9xvYh+U=; h=To:cc:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=SFPHqlG1wzp0t++H9YNGsUxrzulg087GgIGf7oTsgr8VGG0/U6z9X3audYHOU7jDT nM3SZBcbl4CFZZdANDF8r9WZDDOFcGqHPdSom14iwfAKHX96BxeyIuYEKxjlsWGgeC vdUjQq2lYRkyJ3FVr1zD0cVxN0CyBQv1lkw077NMAkNNJTMMoypwsi7DfUf3ybeP8R Wjzz2bfOhN0vUt/GfaXw77ISsb04UHD+ljxRIprzdo4ZoLllXBTHJqFrNh0WLluov0 hKj9W3UtLMo8P91UySg+BLSjHgsHkOcoedjGznHUGMDL1xM3aiihwgttx7m58pK2KL uIeSU3jcGxBAg== Received: from localhost (Mismatch [76.14.1.154]) by impeccant-ellyllon.authn-relay.a.mail.umich.edu with ESMTPSA id 638FED05.364BDD3F.1F9C0242.1131864; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:31:50 -0500 To: Jeremie Juste cc: Johan =?utf-8?Q?Tol=C3=B6?= , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Berry, Charles" From: Greg Minshall Subject: Re: [BUG] ob-R.el: extra empty data.frame columns generated from plain lists after recent change [9.6 (release_9.6-3-ga4d38e @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)] In-reply-to: <87wn74xjv7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wn77mdvk.fsf@toloe.se> <766358.1670208594@archlinux> <87wn74xjv7.fsf@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jeremie Juste message dated "Tue, 06 Dec 2022 23:11:56 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 28.1.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <884810.1670376704.1@archlinux> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:31:44 -0800 Message-ID: <884811.1670376704@archlinux> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=18.216.144.57; envelope-from=minshall@umich.edu; helo=moral-myrddin.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1670376778; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=6MrkTDzwbqqAdTcmXPmxwdVlK0/CiGYGNQVa9xvYh+U=; b=DFpT81sTTi0Tkg2yhA2QrsLy/f88KHtTlryJmj1Ktf/YkCzg6FMO2rDxAXTjUM3idspOtM Tda8NU6NDbB4UzbnwAsVK/CEgnWURbjFgxm0RsV+Cdkv2K4UOt8Vv/vDIn90REXNaX95z2 jM0hchqIFPOBrVMYwJEPJoktlMM0BIPCjwSh2uKXQNNVzkXh9+wdZy6ktTwN3cTO7Mlcwa SlUhpMQ/H0+5ycQsMvEqAl4oIyGhKjoUbGKGs6fFnYdPm7yDhp7MjDYQ5DH1XTeqAnlarK iHiE0BE0ZuiIc5jMcoABVaEUmt3wCFxp583y9O7eXfY4w8UTWCTtweemO/PZgg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1670376778; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TMEwP8NrZy0a0NBqerwR3wWN5hX7GzLg4cMtyPlVPvqCury2Z4Ruu/SVE7r69HU5/nZHCE /EB3Jmjvg2NIjtOn5Kg0dVk4TZwp+hxYUiF1Bbya/P/41Avuyq8h+PZc3ClgG3zQvGYQi/ UMsmsypMBGNp1HFVX34PTTKJkFarHuQ3aFGW+uNkWPV2kZEvyS3vrInhQ2R6610pFauEr+ uiXufIqsvTDf5M94p3ZIrvdXm09/UlsT6yMNo900QTm+O4tOp2ztBxGxeUlJp1f3CuP6o+ 4W1pNAwmNO9YnYnBZf2+r+yiT6tBr2HYMQJKdv+6g0XQBg22bobxf5ADwkuHig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=umich.edu header.s=relay-2018-08-29 header.b=SFPHqlG1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=umich.edu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.77 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=umich.edu header.s=relay-2018-08-29 header.b=SFPHqlG1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=umich.edu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B78613F7B1 X-Spam-Score: -6.77 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ormhdFRrsXLF Jeremie, i am neutral w.r.t. what the output should be. like you, i've always sent in tables. for me, i don't know that it makes much difference how lists are presented to R code, as long as it is well-defined and stable over time. given that, iiuc, 9.5 presented a list as (the equivalent of) multiple rows of a table, i'd vote for staying with (going back to) that. (i think that's what the two modifications in Chuck's e-mail give you.) cheers, Greg