From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode Version 5.07 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: <883a54ee60a13c01fd22b2ef3c35ffeb@science.uva.nl> References: <2ae851ed8680bed6915861cb29420016@science.uva.nl> <87wsvdkqhz.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IR0Uk-000260-IR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:00:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IR0Uj-000258-PO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:00:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IR0Uj-00024x-IH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:00:41 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IR0Ui-0003cl-Vp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:00:41 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IR0Uh-0003iw-Nz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:00:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wsvdkqhz.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Aug 30, 2007, at 17:10, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > > Hi Carsten, > >> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w) | CANCELED(c) DONE(d) > > Is it possible to set those globally via `org-todo-keywords', too? If > yes, what's the syntax? You can just write the keywords like "TODO(t)" in the global list, that should work. I am not happy about it because this is different from the tags setting. So I might modify the "official" syntax at some point - that is why the syntax above is not documented. However, I expect that writing it like this will continue to work - so go ahead and use it. - Carsten