From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:28 -0400 Message-ID: <8822.1277231428@alphaville.usa.hp.com> References: <20100620094925.GA20877@upsilon.cc> <08902A9B-0C7F-41FB-AC8F-BFC65F296B5E@gmail.com> <20100622072316.GA14230@upsilon.cc> <4C208DAD.2060109@manor-farm.org> <64F0D23D-3D32-482C-8F95-ACF82F0FEFCF@gmail.com> <20100622104109.GA17922@upsilon.cc> <4756.1277217311@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20100622164051.GA25088@upsilon.cc> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34349 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR8Ey-0001TF-DJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR8Ex-0000a9-DV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:32 -0400 Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:10002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR8Ex-0000Zk-7V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Stefano Zacchiroli of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:40:51 +0200." <20100622164051.GA25088@upsilon.cc> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stefano Zacchiroli Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:35:11AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > > Next time you are online, just git clone the Worg repository to your > > machine. Then periodically, git pull. Problem solved. > > Sure, the problem will be solved for *me* (in fact, it already is: I > cloned the Worg repo just a minute later reading some of the other posts > in that thread :-)). I'm fairly sure that others will have the same > problem, until they discover the Worg repo, whereas they surely already > know about the in-Emacs org-mode documentation. YMMV. > ... and others can see this thread in the mailing list and follow suit. Or they can use the info doc (section 1.1, "Summary") to find the org website and follow the link to Worg. Or they can ask on the list. And once they know how to get there, there will be no need for another documentation blob to land on *everybody's* disk. Besides, if they can't find it in one of those ways, what makes you think that they will be able to find it even if it is on their disk? > Take this just as a feature request entitled "please ship Worg snapshots > as part of the org-mode documentation"; as a feature request, feel free > to ignore it if you don't think it's worth implementing. > Just in case it's not clear already :-) I personally don't think it's worth it (but I am a marginal voice at best.) What might be worth it is adding a sentence or two in the Summary section of the orgmode manual, pointing out Worg's existence: if you don't know about it, it's impossible to find, but once you know, the problem becomes trivial. Regards, Nick