From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nuutti Kotivuori Subject: Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:08:02 +0300 Message-ID: <87zlzhsa4d.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> References: <200709181700.17786.zslevin@gmail.com> <572452f66890dd8ebca04908cbd33e29@gmail.com> <87y7f3v5qh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <69ce18fe638d5ec66232d221c36c7814@science.uva.nl> <871wctcvfa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IYMhs-0002ZQ-7r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:08:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IYMhr-0002Xj-0c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:08:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYMhq-0002XW-Rg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:08:38 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IYMhq-00025N-Cc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:08:38 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IYMhY-0004ES-Lw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:08:20 +0200 Received: from naked.iki.fi ([62.142.249.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:08:20 +0200 Received: from naked by naked.iki.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:08:20 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > The only thing that still tickles me here is that the *default* priority > is not the *easiest* to assign. So why not this: I've never understood what's the difference between a line with the default priority and a line without a priority at all. That is, with the default settings: * [#B] Foo * Bar Are these not equivalent in priority sorting? If so, why should the default priority be ever explicitly said? -- Naked