From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Patch for windowing problem Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87zlazglxn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <4A5F8060.3060607@sift.info> <87k5281a7r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> <87iqhrlp6o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A60737E.3080600@sift.info> <87r5weqsm5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A64C5F0.6070701@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSz6y-0006z1-WF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:05:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSz6s-0006xj-KZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:05:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37706 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSz6s-0006xZ-EN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:05:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com ([209.85.222.202]:64738) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSz6r-0008Fe-Pt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:05:18 -0400 Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so1770218pzk.14 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:05:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A64C5F0.6070701@sift.info> (Robert Goldman's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:30:56 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Goldman Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Robert Goldman writes: > I will see if I can set up a test case, involving creating some frames, > that might display this problem on vanilla Emacs. I'm afraid it's not a > very high priority for me, since it will involve getting Org working on > a different machine. Thanks for this. I will also try to reproduce the problem on vanilla Emacs -- btw, can you suggest a simple recipe on how to reproduce it with emacs -Q (and relevant frame config, of course)? > However, I'm inclined to suggest that, if this is NOT a problem on > vanilla emacs, and my patch does not /damage/ operations on vanilla > emacs while making life easier on aquamacs, we can safely push it. If this is a bug in Aquamacs, we shouldn't fix it in Emacs, even if the workaround doesn't break anything -- by using such a workaround we just remove incentives for Aquamacs people to fix the bug. Anyway, perhaps it's an Emacs + Org problem, so let's test and see! PS: Remember I'm just a temporary maintainer, so I'm just double-careful about not introducing unnecessary changes... -- Bastien