From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xavier Maillard Subject: Re: TODO keywords into drawers ? Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:00:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87zl9xc5gu.wl%xma@gnu.org> References: <874os5elig.wl%xma@gnu.org> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdTup-0001sx-SA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:00:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdTuk-0001rc-NY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:00:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33178 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdTuk-0001rZ-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:00:10 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37695) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdTuk-0000Ct-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:00:10 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MdTuh-0005Yn-ID for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:00:07 +0200 Received: from cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net ([82.244.211.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:00:07 +0200 Received: from xma by cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:00:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:40:08 -0400, Matt Lundin wrote: > Warning: it can be much slower to search for properties than to search > for todo-states and tags. Can you explain why it could be much slower ? Xavier