From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Noorul Islam K M Subject: Re: ReRe[2]: need detailed instructions for submitting the patch Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:39:21 +0530 Message-ID: <87zkwtka66.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net> References: <872864733.20100810015957@gmail.com> <20100809233613.GA2414@soloJazz.com> <87y6cfb80y.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <934840289.20100810190005@gmail.com> <87eie67af2.fsf@gnu.org> <133680733.20100810213320@gmail.com> <87vd7i2wc7.fsf@altern.org> <19674.1281463074@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <1645190369.20100810221422@gmail.com> <7337F995-8B14-4BB9-8E37-52FBEA74F760@tsdye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53229 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oj3aQ-0004y6-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:10:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oj3aP-0002Qz-6M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:10:46 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:61173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oj3aP-0002Qq-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:10:45 -0400 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so5432971yxs.0 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:10:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7337F995-8B14-4BB9-8E37-52FBEA74F760@tsdye.com> (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:29:30 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Ivanov Dmitry "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > Aloha Dmitry, > > Another reason for working in topic branches is it leaves your master > branch clean so that changes in the remote are easily merged. You're > are probably more computer savvy than I am, but my struggles with > merges after making changes to the master branch have been trying. I > try to leave master clean at all times now. > I would like to try this approach. I have been finding it very hard to maintain the master branch with the other approach. Thanks Noorul