From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:02:50 -0600 Message-ID: <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46651 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeWwH-0002GF-87 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:02:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeWwG-0006uF-AD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:02:53 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:46191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeWwG-0006u0-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:02:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:37:11 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik "Eric Schulte" writes: > I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style > for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could > fruitfully be combined with the Worg re-organization. I'm not a web-designer, but here's my stab at re-designing Worg: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/ I think a good addition to Worg would be the option to view it with or without the javascript section folding. I personally prefer the entire web page to be visible without clicking. Is there a way to do this I'm not aware of? Regards, Jason