From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Danjou Subject: Re: Let's stick to one list for now Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:34:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87zkpg8k9r.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <4D6B6FFA.50706@gmail.com> <877hcks9qt.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1866763985==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51861 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pu1Ne-0002nx-Kn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:35:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu1Nc-0001po-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:35:09 -0500 Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:58012 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu1Nc-0001pP-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:35:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877hcks9qt.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:02:02 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============1866763985== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote: The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I already splitted user list in some project and nothing bad happened. :) > Julien, I guess your life would be easier if you get push access to the > Org repo and an account on the patchwork -- so that you can test patches > and improve them if needed. > > Would that be okay for you? Well, access to the patchwork will at least allow me to contrate and work on dev things that have a patch, for sure. > This decision is not carved in stone -- but I'm about to release Org 7.5 > and I don't want to undertake a mailing list split in the middle of this > process. I understand that. =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNa4hgAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCDDUP/3h6WLOx9M4xviHI80VW8/Dv cF6Ng9h9b+NgiQUWiBljDCANnWyH13SRq/4doLagRFynrraiy2SBVQBwMRPWnXgl k9pOkMeSi/37QcCIAKMhIzRmAPoBFrUEe1y6hh8N4CZRoTcpKDBPi0XEZ3WL/Xuc gJlSOg38bGPe74v6gR95Y4P66mE/fUshudyUsVeM1RYuO2+9+z+OjHlTY54JRDYE ZAlXGvIhIGRuqiyZchqtw3phaAej5Fp5e5p5iQESCcsQOsTwO49C3kv5KZbXwogt gJrNaBUeN8mLIXpYUjgqYr28c1tvZblw5sqLRkO2BgcZJmuiOQwVlb0+NCG4whZ8 RDCghpvIaMziwSKaZO5yYw7bABJcXcgbmwZfyfPRGeEUbtyCjXJzOYOuXPIZswGE hN1RQScJ3ZEg1vS7L5HwskUHTcDwOD/FOnecBMTsyQZmNBP85SlvenXM8Aimtaka omCNZ/2GCw7R90G/0tko6VcUHzPS8iLTEOW/0Ca0lP470lCa+CJDzCk0dzIH2K2k iHyaxH+BFl42iBtIfPZhet5s5mg14L+xsP0oIx0AKDQwLrGJIQRRdVpTkr+FbJAU JoQHPFjL7zugas6+JJ0b5XNPvgqmuSYH1XQL/oM/dz/jKTr3ghYGnZmsNb6XjUba uxqiQx28IIjfX6hNOxcE =EqQl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1866763985== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1866763985==--