From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Albinus Subject: Re: bug-tracker Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:36:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjyv32il.fsf@gmx.de> References: <5127744D.3050702@easy-emacs.de> <8738woo0y7.fsf@gmx.de> <87mwuwp0jx.fsf@engster.org> <87ip5k3xfg.fsf@gmx.de> <87d2vs5b7j.fsf@engster.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U99f2-0005Kh-SM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:36:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U99f0-00077J-5U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:36:44 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U99ez-000772-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:36:42 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.20]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LwkgY-1UtNT62LRg-016P0z for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:36:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d2vs5b7j.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:45:52 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode David Engster writes: > I was always under the impression that those tags are merely a way for, > well, tagging bugs, so that you can search for them. Same for > packages. I didn't know that this also implied that you're encouraged to > report bugs against upstream packages, possibly for features which are > not yet in Emacs (or may even never land there, like some stuff in > org/contrib, cedet/contrib, etc.). This must be discussed with the Emacs maintainers, of course. If org error reports will contain a substantial part of non-core Emacs problems, an own debbugs package "org" might be better. Reports arriving via the Emacs report chain could be reassigned to both packages "emacs,org" then. I recommend to contact Glenn Morris. > -David Best regards, Michael.