From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: C-c ^ not fully useful Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:47:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjyr9xgo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <86vc9p1kiu.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87hal0pws8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sj4kn159.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86mwuslacg.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAHqH-0000UI-L8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAHqG-0007xN-DJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:33:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:46486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAHqG-0007wv-6C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:33:00 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id es5so3334748wgb.5 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:32:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86mwuslacg.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Fran=E7o?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?is?= Pinard"'s message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:46:55 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi François, François Pinard writes: > P.S. About an option to sort the previous way, that is, by the physical > contents of the line, visible or not, I do not have a use case for it, I > would not need such an option. > > I sometimes, yet not often, need to group together links by their > originating site, and then, the standard Emacs line sorting function > gave me a very good approximation, good enough for my little needs. Thanks for your feedback on this. We will announce the feature widely enough so that users who need the parameter can chime in. Best, -- Bastien