From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [ANN] Merge of new export framework on Wednesday Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:09:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjykbeay.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <876229nrxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzh1xg0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCCPu-0003fK-GE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:09:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCCPt-0000q2-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:09:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:56333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCCPt-0000pu-BL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:09:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 8so3621844wgl.18 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 09:09:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Sean O'Halpin's message of "Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:25:57 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sean O'Halpin Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Org Mode List Hi Sean, "Sean O'Halpin" writes: > Also, it's just struck me - wouldn't it be more consistent if > ATTR_HTML were HTML_ATTR, ATTR_LATEX were LATEX_ATTR, etc.? I don't really think so -- ATTR_HTML is more like BEGIN_HTML than #+HTML_HEAD, which is a global option, not a local setting or an environment... and we can't break all .org files like this :) -- Bastien