From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [ODT] Subtree export gives wrong footnote style
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:51:52 +0100
Message-ID: <87zjxmweqf.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2a9pn20i1.fsf@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53841)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ULYmm-000802-Lw
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:52:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ULYmk-0002gW-NS
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:52:00 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:56403)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ULYmk-0002gJ-Hb
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:51:58 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c11so404547wgh.32
	for <Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2a9pn20i1.fsf@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:05:10 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Moe <christian.moe@hf.uio.no>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Christian Moe <christian.moe@hf.uio.no> writes:

> The new ODT exporter sometimes, but not always fails to put footnotes in
> Footnote style as expected. They are left in Text Body, which is wrong
> (and surprisingly difficult to fix in LibreOffice).
>
> After a bit of trial and failure, it seems the error depends on the
> scope of export: 
>
> Exporting the whole buffer gives correct footnote style.
>
> Exporting a subtree only fails to give the correct style -- *unless* the
> footnote is included in the subtree. In the example below, I actually
> get a mix of stylesm depending on whether the footnote is defined in the
> exported section or outside it. Org-mode is clearly able to find both
> footnotes, and recognize them as footnotes, so I'm baffled at the
> different styling.

I see where the problem lies. In order to implement an appropriate fix,
I need to know the answer of the following problem:

In regular contents, paragraphs within centered blocks get the
"OrgCenter" style. So, in the following example:

  Para 1
  #+begin_center
  Para 2
  #+end_center

style for "Para 1" (resp. "Para 2") is "Text_20_body" (resp.
"OrgCenter").

Now consider the following example where everything is located within
a footnote definition:

  [fn:1] Para 1
    #+begin_center
    Para 2
    #+end_center

"Para 1" obviously gets "Footnote" as style. I'm not sure about "Para
2". What is the appropriate style for it?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou