From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: APPT_WARNTIME not honored anymore in 8.0 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:38:37 -0400 Message-ID: <87zjwu9xhu.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87mwsuihj6.fsf@kanis.fr> <87k3nys97t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTGCw-0004Ej-6h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:38:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTGCr-0008KK-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:38:50 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UTGCr-0008K6-3n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:38:45 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UTGCq-0005uu-0V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:38:44 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:38:44 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:38:44 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Ivan, > > Ivan Kanis writes: > >> Suppose I have the following entry: >> >> ** Karaoke <2012-09-21 Fri 20:00 +1w> >> :PROPERTIES: >> :APPT_WARNTIME: 17 >> :END: >> >> I should get a notice 17mn before 20:00 that I need to go to karaoke. >> Now it does the default 90mn. It's a regression. > > I can't reproduce this -- I assume you added the appointment with > `org-agenda-to-appt', right? > FWIW, neither can I. -- Nick