From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-list-allow-alphabetical LaTeX export Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:12:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjv2w4xo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <93BA1627-D7F6-4E96-9AFC-927A6F6C8C6E@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkuaN-0000n2-8R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 07:12:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkuaM-0005Yg-1f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 07:11:59 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:33082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkuaL-0005YZ-RR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 07:11:57 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id p60so1278019wes.13 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 04:11:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 6 Jun 2013 21:45:58 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Josiah Schwab , Michael Bach , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: > This is a good point - but this calls for something else: A mechanism > to name a particular list item and refer to it by name. In LaTeX you > can put a \label into an ordered list item and refer to it with \ref. > I am not sure if the new exporter allows this for list items, but I do > not thing so. Nicolas, has this ever been considered? I don't > remember. > > This would be useful. > > Or, make sure you use a LaTeX stype or HTML style file that uses > a specific labeling system. As pointed out by Rasmus in this thread, there is a cross-reference mechanism in the export framework. 1. <> Item 1. 2. Reference to item [[something]]. It will work in any back-end, but obviously, will ignore alphabetical lists (link will always appear as a number). Speaking of those, my opinion is we should drop them altogether, as they are just (dubious) syntactic sugar, but some users will always expect them to be more than that. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou