From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [RFC] Make QUOTE an export keyword instead of an element type Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: <87zjmi78q7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjmiyhfd.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqhmy91h.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7Wvk-0004SA-FN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:07:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7Wve-0002pj-Al for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:07:48 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7Wve-0002pe-4T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:07:42 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W7Wvb-0002tN-UG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:07:39 +0100 Received: from pool-98-110-175-184.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.175.184]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:07:39 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-98-110-175-184.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:07:39 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Alternatives: >> >> - Treat their contents as `quote-blocks' instead of `example-block' >> - Remove them altogether, since they don't bring anything new. >> >> As a side note, if they are here to stay, it would be good to document >> them. >> >> WDYT? > > I'd be happy to see it go. I'm happy to reserve the space before the > "section-name" for TODO-like words (that is COMMENT can also go IMO). > I agree. Getting rid of COMMENT also sounds reasonable to me although that might produce more backward compatibility problems since it's more likely to have been used. But since the functionality is easily achievable (through :noexport: tags and #+BEGIN_COMMENT/#+END_COMMENT blocks e.g. - one can even add a :comment: tag to the EXCLUDE set if so desired), it should be possible to deprecate it for a while, and then get rid of it. As an added bonus, we can then get rid of one of the (iirc) "questionable" keydefs: C-c ; won't have anything to do. -- Nick