From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [RFC] Association list between major-mode-names and babel identifiers Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:59:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87zjkt0z56.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ob1apusq.fsf@gmail.com> <8738impb3g.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwguw8e8.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87zjktm9g4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOQm5-00080V-5F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:59:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOQlx-0006pD-Rq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:59:41 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOQlx-0006p9-L5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:59:33 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WOQlt-0001B8-95 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:59:29 +0100 Received: from pool-98-110-160-12.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.160.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:59:29 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-98-110-160-12.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:59:29 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Thorsten Jolitz writes: >> >>> thank you, so I marked calc, latex, ocaml, and sh as cross-ckecked now, >>> and unmarked R. Unfortunately the table arrives almost unreadable here, >>> so I rather post the current state of the association list (; means >>> cross-ckecked): >>> >> >> It's fine with gnus: as a matter of idle curiosity, what mail reader are >> you using? > > Funny enough - I wrote is and received it in gnus too... The only thing that I can think of that would mess it up would be a non-monospaced font then. -- Nick