From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Escaping again! Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:58:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjft2y6t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ha478iyd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877g51f295.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofj-0007Lv-87 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofV-0005Wg-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:15 -0400 Received: from mail-s76.mailgun.info ([184.173.153.204]:51196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofV-0005Un-4S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877g51f295.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:44:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Rustom Mody , emacs-orgmode Hi Nicolas and Rustom, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I have no objection, with appropriate documentation, obviously. > > Be careful, though, as some functions need to be updated accordingly: > `org-list-struct', `org-element--list-struct', > `org-at-item-description-p', `org-list-item-body-column', > `org-at-item-timer-p', `org-list-insert-item'... The latter should > probably use `org-at-item-description-p'. Quite a lot of work for a minor useful restriction. Let's put that aside for 8.4. But if nobody disagree, I think this is a good restriction. -- Bastien