From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [bug, beamer] Frame parameters taken from example code block Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:10:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjfscl33.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <867g4e1l60.fsf@somewhere.org> <87bns9xuoa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ha211e13.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egx4fgn6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87silkz2c5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC87F-0001LW-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC877-0005KW-QH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:10:57 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC877-0005KD-Ca for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:10:49 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XC872-0005HM-5l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:10:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87silkz2c5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:06:34 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, Sebastien Vauban Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > As a side note, "forbidding" blank lines between headlines and the > properties drawer (or better just after the planning line, if any) would > make parsing easier and faster in a lot of cases. Unfortunately, I think > this would break a lot of files, too. Well, we can poll users and see how inconvenient this change would be. (I'm certainly biased here, as I never use blank lines between the headline and the properties drawer.) If it's not too inconvenient, we can plan this for Org 9.0. -- Bastien