From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Syntax inconsistency? Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 02:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjc9dq88.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xl6Ux-00005G-0s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:32:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xl6Uq-00025Y-9O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:31:58 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:34446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xl6Uq-0001yQ-20 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:31:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14ED42270 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 02:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2psoN-JNU-a for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 02:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (99-229.echostar.pl [213.156.99.229]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC56D42245 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 02:31:48 +0100 (CET) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-Mode mailing list Hello, just wondering: on one hand, we have lines like #+OPTIONS: toc:nil On the other hand, we have #+ATTR_ASCII: :width 10 Why is the syntax (seemingly, at least) inconsistent? Why not `width:10' or `:toc nil'? Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University