From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:38:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87zja9tawy.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87sig1d8ee.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4slV-0004Oc-GJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:54:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4slS-0006yQ-BU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:54:49 -0500 Received: from mail-db3on0122.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.122]:40448 helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4slS-0006yG-56 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:54:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Peter Neilson's message of "Sat, 27 Dec 2014 04:06:03 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Peter Neilson Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Saturday, 27 Dec 2014 at 04:06, Peter Neilson wrote: [...] > My conclusions? If your paper is trivial and you are under pressure to > produce it quickly, then MS Word might be the best tool. Actually, I don't think I can get any faster than using org for a trivial paper needed quickly... I'm in emacs already ;-) -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-581-g0e52f0