From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: Why not push?
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:33:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87zj8evm8w.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <878ufz76go.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36765)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YN7kS-0007UI-M4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:33:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YN7kP-00038Q-H9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:33:08 -0500
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:36758)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YN7kP-00038D-B7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:33:05 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2CB5207B
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:33:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id sXSGYWuNuXEc for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:33:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8044F52063
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:33:04 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <878ufz76go.fsf@gmx.us>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On 2015-02-15, at 12:35, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:

> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious.  I'm looking at t=
he
>> function `org-split-string'.  It uses (two times) the following
>> construction:
>>
>> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>>
>> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
>
> These days you even have split-string in subr which you can make behave
> like org-split-string.

Interesting.  I'll look into it.

> Oh, and there's all the cl re-implementations...  I like org-some bette=
r
> than cl-some just cause it sounds nice when you say it (try):=20

Yes, it seems to me that reinventing the wheel is quite common in Emacs
libraries.

>      org (tiny pause) some.

At least one lame pun comes to mind...

> =E2=80=94Rasmus

Best,

--=20
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University