From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: How to elegantly and effectively quote org fragments?
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 21:59:51 +0200
Message-ID: <87zj4vdpzc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <21853.2216.358897.903242@frac.u-strasbg.fr>
	<871ti94mjk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<21854.45700.397098.880360@frac.u-strasbg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54354)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YwFYy-0001Uq-OE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 15:58:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YwFYx-0004Wj-Ne
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 15:58:28 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:49120)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YwFYx-0004Wb-Gz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 15:58:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <21854.45700.397098.880360@frac.u-strasbg.fr> (Alain Cochard's
	message of "Fri, 22 May 2015 06:37:24 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes:

> Ah, thank you.  If I understand correctly, though, once one does that
> (in an SRC org block, say) one looses the ability to edit the block as
> org code using org-edit-special (C-c ').

You can, in development version.

> I understand that the indentation is virtual; it is just that I would
> (ideally) expect for the quoted example to visually look the same as
> it does in an org buffer.

That's not possible.

> OK.  I had missed this footnote.  I will live with this, but am still
> surprised by this fact -- the SRC org block looks ugly to me.  When we
> enter [[xx]] (say) the brackets become invisible, so I had assumed
> that a similar mechanism could exist here; I guess there are
> advantages to the present situation that I do not see...

I am not sure about what situation you're talking about, fontification
or escaping mechanism.

About the latter, the idea was to make it as little intrusive as
possible. In most languages, you never need to escape anything. Of
course, Org is an exception since many lines could conflict with
enclosing document.

Regards,