From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: org-block-background in 8.3.1? Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:55:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87zj1w4fai.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87wpx1b4tu.fsf@kmlap.domain.org> <86h9o5kl2u.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPZjh-0001IR-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:22:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPZjd-00037N-Q3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:22:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com ([209.85.192.50]:36270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPZjd-00037A-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:22:41 -0400 Received: by qgdd90 with SMTP id d90so14980034qgd.3 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat-130-132-173-5.central.yale.edu. [130.132.173.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p111sm3509190qge.37.2015.08.12.10.22.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86h9o5kl2u.fsf@example.com> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:44:09 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-mode Sebastien Vauban writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: >> org-block-background was removed in f8b42e8 ("Don't use an overlay for >> src blocks backgrounds", 2014-07-28) for performance reasons. > > IIRC, we never saw a profiler report showing that it slowed down buffer > fontification in a visible way. Correct me if I'm wrong. > > Really, it has been removed because of a problem when ps-print'ing an > Org buffer -- though the bug was to find in `ps-def.el' and not in Org, > as reported by Stefan Monnier [1]. It should have been fixed there > instead. Thank you for the background information. My comment was based solely off the commit message for f8b42e8. -- Kyle