From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-taskjuggler.el: allow direct 'depends' specification Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:20:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87ziylqnu5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vb9akcwc.fsf@feelingofgreen.ru> <87egfysorn.fsf@gmail.com> <87d1vijn0p.fsf@feelingofgreen.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwL18-0003IQ-Sk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:20:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwL13-0007wt-Vm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:20:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]:37763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwL13-0007vF-QG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:20:05 -0500 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so26157291wmw.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:20:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d1vijn0p.fsf@feelingofgreen.ru> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Kosyrev Serge <_deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru> Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Kosyrev, 2015ko azaroak 10an, Kosyrev Serge-ek idatzi zuen: >=20 > Generally speaking, TaskJuggler own "attributes" and "properties" are > very numerous. Suffice to point to the documentation: >=20 > http://taskjuggler.org/tj3/manual/ >=20 > Org is only able to provide a very limited amount of those, and the > approach it takes is by white-listing the properties that ought to > "pass through" from Org to TJP files. >=20 > So, naturally, whenever one faces a limitation in ox-taskjuggler, > the desire to extend the list arises. >=20 > I'm not sure how this relates to an average user, to be honest, > and whether I've at all helped with your question.. >=20 > How do we proceed? The difference between a defvar and a defcustom is whether the variable shows up in M-x customize. Customize often serves as the first port of call for users discovering the features of a library. So the question is, will presenting users with such a list in the customize interface empower them to have better taskjuggler export? Or will it be too intimidating? It=E2=80=99s a subjective decision, I was just wondering whe= ther you had considered it. Either way, it would be good to put the documentation link you gave into the docstring, as a pointer to the allowed values of the variable. Does that make sense? --=20 Aaron Ecay