From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Subject: Re: Can export the files with bibliography only to LaTeX Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:54:37 -0200 Message-ID: <87zi6ijsvm.fsf@hyperbola.info> References: <877etq76gk.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87shcdbjbd.fsf@hyperbola.info> <87a7ylpk75.fsf@gmail.com> <87374cqklv.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mv2joefp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQJTs-0002YC-Qs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:54:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQJTo-00036A-TU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:54:48 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:44286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQJTo-00034l-Mh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:54:44 -0500 Received: from adfeno-pc1 (unknown [IPv6:2804:14c:cc82:928c:ac40:6116:7224:91d0]) (Authenticated sender: adfeno@hyperbola.info) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3508917209A for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:54:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87mv2joefp.fsf@gmail.com> (Tim Cross's message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2017 08:43:06 +1100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This serves as good argumentation: For all of those reading this and which have other people making demands such as "you must use this (non-free) software", please remind these people that what matters is the content, not the tool in this case. Besides, if they really want to go the "efficiency" route, they should just accept plain text files since these are lightweight. ;) 2017-12-16T08:43:06+1100 Tim Cross wrote: > The saddest part of this message is the last line about your publishers > also requiring word doc! A long time since I had to deal with > publishers, but at least they use to require Latex (albeit often with > weird *.sty files!). > > After 17 years working in an 'admin' area of a University, I got to the > end of my tether and resigned 3 weeks ago. A big part of this was due to > the extent the administrative arm is now dictating direction and a > feeling the tail is now wagging the dog. Too much of what is being > required is based on making the administration 'efficient' rather than > focusing on making teaching, learning and research effective. > > Good news is 7 days after finishing, I got a new position within a > research centre where my role is 100% technical, I'm free to use > whatever 'tool' I want provided I produce the final outcome i.e. good > looking presentations and documents (all org and Latex!) and solid > technical solutions. > > Like others who have replied, Pandoc was my 'goto' solution for dealing > with administration. It is an incredibly powerful tool and worth some > time investment IMO. > > Tim