From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Moe Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCmKs-0000NP-Up for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:25:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCmKn-0001WO-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:25:50 -0400 Received: from mailer-211-152.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.152]:44559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCmKn-0001Va-J5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:25:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou So, user feedback: I'm fine with not enabling by default. I don't use any of these, but it sounds like the new default expansion mechanism Nicolas mentioned might suit me if I ever switch from my homemade insert-block function (which does prompts and regions). Yours, Christian Bastien writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> You disagreed with me in the first place with commit 71ad7b1. It was my >> original intent to not load Org Tempo by default. > > Sorry if I missed the statement where you explicitely said you thought > org-tempo should not be enabled by default, I thought it was just an > oversight and I didn't realize I was in a disagreement with you when I > pushed this commit -- if I thought so, I'd write to you on the list to > raise the topic instead of forcing a change through a commit. > > Again, I may be wrong in thinking disabling this will cause trouble to > many users. Let's just take a moment to see what users think. > > Thanks,