From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Faster version of org-find-olp
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:17:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87zhdq9aj7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <871rxku0po.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87eevazs0m.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tv46me4x.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59881)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1j13JX-0001Pj-9Q
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 02:17:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87tv46me4x.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of
 "Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:54:54 -0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> I ended up writing a function on top of that that does find-or-create,
> so you can go to a certain outline path, creating and inserting
> (optionally in sorted order) the missing segments as you go. It was
> fairly difficult to get right, so perhaps it will be of use to someone,
> or appropriate for Worg or even Org proper:
>
> https://github.com/girzel/timesheet.el/blob/master/timesheet.el#L250

thanks for this - don't hesitate to reference it somewhere on Worg if
you think that's useful.

If you think this should go to Org's core, please make a patch and
tell what's the difference with your patch and how to test it to make
sure we really understand the issue at stake.  I don't have any issue
with the current implementation of `org-find-olp' so I cannot really
know.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien