From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhdaoijq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org> <878skwos8h.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgj3hsgx.fsf@bzg.fr> <87eeumeqo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5UsH-0002wL-LI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:31:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87eeumeqo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:45:42 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Diego Zamboni , Org-mode Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > In this case, a strong argument against it is: there is already a > template mechanism available out of the box, why would we provide > two of them? I bet most users of the <* completion mechanism provided by org-tempo don't even notice it is a "template" mechanism. Org used to provide a *completion* mechanism for <* at the beginning of the line, then this completion mechanism was moved in org-tempo, which names does not really speaks about _completing_ <* strings. Anyway, I think we settled the case: 1. let's not supercharge Org's core with two template mechanismes; 2. let's try to provide a completion mechanism on top of the current template expansion mechanism -- an intermediary step being having an expert dispatch mode for org-insert-structure-template. I'll try to do that for 9.5. Best, -- Bastien