From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id aCARDDb5yWTdyQAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 08:35:34 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6BU4Czb5yWRhOwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 08:35:34 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842EA4FDA7 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=B4dGQJL6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1690958134; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=fTXxAmzVCpcAuLZTE1lo5qCADu2a3sWKo0FlrCC/0zE=; b=fIB5D/Z84aL1atP1V2SY1CYvyal6wt0WjFf4eCcnm6OnezPLLCjK6i8JhXMK32qfIQbWh1 7P2XxFQvQ6SDtt6wisyviYF75mPB/JIjBVzVxEarQyjj3VJH0kfWXAOwSGMtoBHf6/pJ5E 1acTeXurGyl3n4M1gnLAagVPv//a4SgfpYiE/lj+lJEU/Kqhuwkqt65aDkfBrXHllUQqFy GneNoXpQp4UxKeKc0XSbaqg4/z3+LgCTO12daqxv6cCDqK4uFSa1yqW9CwQpZQpkrznVBM wSQhfSJ9vhbQRwlwJkhKVBtCIOgaaJG3EPh2IPiTDGGemBVua1RTmADg2/ZjIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=B4dGQJL6; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1690958134; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SBiJVuJYlKo2up12Wf/jEW81fULHEujvXt6PHPNZeu09iAAcurysk2mHrUZwIbnV4XGl9i a9hStg+Q2p8HJTJTzFxqq6mIRg4A8LnsVFY0v59G1cT8Jsa3ihehv3MXeflC0v3vTRTnvk Iq9OyfsO2ALPuQA3RQ+GTKqY2/3aMbbXKfnIpD83t4/b9N/TtScs8UGfoydMLUdl4p3sWf JRMRGaF14VGhUaUS4y9F0hSo1vrMUrqLi0GATtug/x6lxqm/xqbMef3+jkaETl15S5S4dV pDCCF1kzyYHtf9Va3zfDg8OztRp9vW11wkjgcOVeGKTZKlMcfW4gfRxskrUYzQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qR5RQ-0007Ff-TR; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:34:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qR5RH-0007F6-Qr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:34:32 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qR5RF-00082i-Cv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:34:31 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B80D240028 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:34:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1690958066; bh=Ob0ydxScgFDcc0zn98ILyu9m3oMT0mzM6APrtZEbsXQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=B4dGQJL6uwszYRClfOm/D0ynHMumMkQEhOa3MdQywP1vqVZrT0UrXz5LP3qkkZUE7 5l93OGezJDweWK/fw9dJ3eG+4XDwkGyDSF6TMImlYDLUS4qFdn7UcMS1+3KKDL8RQM VXmvxIn9yKQxmX2aVc8tmf2qbzbg2xYOHLlm+yX4ujeHVFaUwVTF5YKqGBJm07e71l 8kr6RgFE2idQBjgyRuniKLMuRyWz/dHPsqybl0rfnuaf9/KYqFySdqMJmUPHM90Z7X Q6S4CkTGqHvXW84gwu2TY1rbsrXIQ2cYkD5CK0rTnyvVR5pzPPV4nu47oQuTZ9xPNc YLZ9kdOCaswIg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RG2JK581Kz6twf; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:34:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: "Fraga, Eric" Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list Subject: Re: is LOCATION not a valid property? org-lint complains! In-Reply-To: <87y1iuyb3m.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <873512zrek.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <878raupwb7.fsf@localhost> <87y1iuyb3m.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 06:34:37 +0000 Message-ID: <87zg3ane9u.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.82 X-Spam-Score: -7.82 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 842EA4FDA7 X-TUID: lovxVwfhLVwb "Fraga, Eric" writes: > On Tuesday, 1 Aug 2023 at 16:22, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> ox-koma-letter, which you likely use, understands EXPORT_LOCATION >> property, but not LOCATION. > > Ah, interesting. Yes, I do use (infrequently) ox-koma-letter. Whereas > all my other org related tools understand LOCATION and not > EXPORT_LOCATION. I will ignore these (false positive) lines. I now updated the linter to mention the backend name. Also, I made it ignore `org-default-properties' known by Org. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=20d90b979 >>> : 60 low Potentially malformed timestamp. Recognized: <2021-01-29 Fri 16:00-17:00> >> >> May you give an example of a timestamp at "60"? > > <2021-01-29 16:00-17:00> > > and I now immediately see the subtle (or not so subtle) difference: > there is no day of the week specified. > > I misunderstood the message from org-lint: it is telling me what it > thinks the timestamp was intended to be, not what I had actually > specified! Maybe the output from org-lint should say "Interpreted as" > instead of "recognized"? Or even "recognized as" would be better. I changed the message to include the original timestamp and used "parsed as" https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=7b80334fd -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at