From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GFCjIVOnq2U4fgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:58:27 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id GFCjIVOnq2U4fgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:58:27 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=J9sJmf0J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705748307; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ZnDqGLKO84vXfrjLFu+qxMvURCkjFBYUKsQq2vjTQyo=; b=rDBkzFqPMQ77o1RhdTnJgsSbpuCy1W9LV/P4KGzdXUU7EZo8hlq8WMwPHZgtyvHJShnMMu i3SjAdMN5qx2ipU+nHFJlv/xqIg2AnZjWtkWg1v9HFe61YWbuLyG0gprFDfaKHHu2cfcrz J/ml/hyBoCW8NQZv/IBjdtBSngFVO2B9+Y5SF76CWsTJ/oRN1PQiTa1Dgmj5gCilxhADK/ gNWRQe6VnJDEIYFvWos6nUCy/xgx6+1ThIoYXgI77yWsi0OfqENP5UDuhO+Zgbb00Jc4cG lMqWdZ0tKAwtajsWRxJ1yZtJwn4Cg9xeJO0b2eIIs4/2kpvjgd5CnfXZIjSaJg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705748307; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bz2rrn5Vy/yQWWqYD/0M1XNUxtIt8Dvt5Tm8r+Jctdi8ihDGv7BClt4crvzZv5KyqFpRxS +tp3hlEQT+f9AdciDIQA0xJLgTTlEkV+DZSymMmbttXFp9tiGaG4t0dvoE5lv5dftmHmhN S6qfcwD+vd3uABTVa3yOlWUn0+Op+Bf+X5FG0R+x/6enUvnXM1Eyia+RDflxMiwuNEmk6+ 6eBHIzV60d6uGEEX4G37HHA7f44TTwThAtEv08uxKQ1yxW0CzA01sEWyiZeBqHExjFlK8z Rnh3NmJHK7Q1uaCyDmTZ9tunpT8J+mf4zyEWHR30qo5x4SHW5N5vkLvxxzxLqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=J9sJmf0J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39AB6E71A for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:58:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rR92e-0001BV-03; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 05:57:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rR92b-0001Ay-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 05:57:33 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rR92Y-0000mH-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 05:57:33 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528AA240028 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:57:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1705748247; bh=UKZXQgL+W6D7KGhSyiuAGZUfn/NfQKHOltyH49YK3NY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=J9sJmf0JELWqJdUutFVV3/5YhzPj/Q2Zv7p7v9Fqu+wMkiL57+3bQRrI/dG+WO3+c QpKFJPMMcD3X+pAukMMduJIJWm7enTXJ/bHvGgN0KGMcZLE9eW5PKhXC0/hZiN1u/k zpGpnTvH36IKub9QmDa6ucT0P5R1P9LgKdaPZHBrj9lTTnOfDfCO13zZChD0edAKR0 eXZHRGwIugxD8gns0ERjKYmVI/LJVFdSsdqN1kuzt0WJb3Td0Aker/cvae5q1ed/uh +AJK9Lh/eKPaMQOtPmQc7Jg2KSm+HDJcPJA2kUdj2ppr24fw/22varl16XQjapE2G3 GLM5JJ1EvdqwQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4THD2t4nD1z9rxG; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:57:26 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Max Nikulin Cc: Ihor Radchenko , orgmode Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export In-Reply-To: (Max Nikulin's message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2024 17:09:55 +0700") References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:57:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87zfx0ff1n.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E39AB6E71A X-TUID: 4+1Z2pZciGNy Max Nikulin writes: > On 18/01/2024 20:05, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> With the patch, I am getting the following:[...] >> \begin{center} >> \begin{tabular}{lr} >> {[}foo] & 2\\[0pt] >> {[}bar] & 3\\[0pt] >> \end{tabular} >> \end{center} > > It means that [0pt] is not necessary any more. However users will have > adjust their filters once more. I have no idea if many of them will > complain concerning {[} where it is not really required. > (/[omitted]/). > > To have an additional excuse, it is better to add a note that it is > inspired by pandoc strategy. I agree with the note. Perhaps both strategies could coexist: by default, Ihor's code; and org-latex-line-break-safe with value "\\\\". And, after some time, the latter could become obsolete, unless a new ''raison d'etre'' is found for it... In any case, I would no longer see it necessary to modify org-latex-verse-block anymore. Best regards, Juan Manuel