From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-mode & multiple TODO sequences within a file. Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:01:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87y7lrewft.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <45F9783C.8050801@calicojack.co.uk> <1b5202b10a64cf5f04b443c331014035@science.uva.nl> <45FE866A.1050002@calicojack.co.uk> <87bqipp5dw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <45FED11D.2020600@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTgnY-0002B8-I9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:02:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTgnU-00029v-US for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:02:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTgnU-00029s-Qm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:02:52 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HTglu-0000lp-CM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:01:14 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so415128nfc for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45FED11D.2020600@calicojack.co.uk> (Rick Moynihan's message of "Mon\, 19 Mar 2007 18\:06\:21 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rick Moynihan writes: > I quite like the idea of grouping the sequences within braces. However, > I think we might be describing (slightly) different things. To clarify > what I'd REALLY like to be able to do is to define different sequences, > for use within a single file, rather than a single sequence made up of > sub-sequences. I was just thinking of a more general implementation of the "multiple DONE states" you mentionned before. But yes, it's actually a slightly different idea than the one of multiple TODO sequences. Regards, -- Bastien