From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: property searches for #+CATEGORY Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:49:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87y7dam7pj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071107111730.GH13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <3d6808890711070523u50bd8bbp963960978171e132@mail.gmail.com> <20071107133404.GL13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IplHp-0005fk-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:49:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IplHn-0005e0-Q6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:49:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IplHn-0005d9-HF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:49:39 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IplHk-0005vg-Oc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:49:37 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so128564ugf for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:49:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20071107133404.GL13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:34:04 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Adam Spiers writes: >> It would seem to me that this is exactly what tags does. >> You could move everything down a level and use tag inheritance: >> * personal stuff :personal: >> * work stuff :work: > > I could, but this would mean that each file would have a single > top-level entry, and the entire contents would be indented an extra > level, which I fear is a rather unattractive solution! ..which is exactly why your request about using a per-file #+CATEGORY when searching across files is more about *grouping files* than about grouping tasks. Am I wrong? -- Bastien