From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:22:59 +0800 Message-ID: <87y6p7856k.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <79C410DE-6FE7-4E74-A166-9BF9619EE8E3@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgSmV-0000t4-Ar for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:23:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgSmQ-0000nS-PV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:23:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46964 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MgSmQ-0000nN-Ib for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:23:54 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f180.google.com ([209.85.211.180]:58786) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgSmQ-0003EV-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:23:54 -0400 Received: by ywh10 with SMTP id 10so898995ywh.7 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:23:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79C410DE-6FE7-4E74-A166-9BF9619EE8E3@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:06:11 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode Mailinglist , Carsten Dominik Carsten Dominik writes: > 1. n/p remain as they where > 2. Moving forward/backward though time will be `f' and `b' > 3. Follow mode goes to the "F" key, a capital letter does > make sense here given that some other modes like [G]rid > and clock[R]eport and [D]iary are on capitals as well. > 4. `org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer' is already on > `C-c C-x b' which is the same key as in a normal Org > buffer. Therefore, I think we do not need to find a > replacement for the `b' binding. Fine! > 5. The cursor keys and are remapped to a > function that does nothing, except showing a message > that you should now use f/b to move through time. Why not letting the and keys doing their usual job of C-b and C-f? We can still display the message... > We could have an option to allow users to get the time > motion or cursor motion on left/right, if there was enough > support/need for this. I do not think that this is strictly > necessary, because every user can of course rebind keys > in any way she likes. Yes. I would spare the option. -- Bastien